You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neoplasms
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Histological Characteristics of Metastasizing Thin Melanomas

A Case-Control Study of 43 Cases

Joan Guitart, MD; Lori Lowe, MD; Michael Piepkorn, MD, PhD; Victor G. Prieto, MD, PhD; Michael S. Rabkin, MD, PhD; Salve G. Ronan, MD; Christopher R. Shea, MD; Victor A. Tron, MD; Wain White, MD; Raymond L. Barnhill, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:603-608.

Objective  To study clinical and histological features associated with metastasizing thin melanomas (MTMs).

Design  Case-control study of clinicopathological features of patients with MTMs by a panel of 10 dermatopathologists.

Setting  Members of the North American Melanoma Pathology Study Group selected the cases from the melanoma databases at 8 academic institutions.

Patients  Forty-three patients with MTMs (<1 mm thick) and 42 control subjects without metastasis matched for age, sex, tumor site, and Breslow thickness.

Intervention  None.

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical (age, sex, site of lesion, stage at diagnosis, metastasis site, disease-free survival, and outcome) and histological (Breslow thickness, Clark level, growth phase, regression, and inflammatory response) features of patients with MTMs vs controls.

Results  There was an overrepresentation of axial tumors among patients with MTMs. Extensive regression was present in 18 patients (42%) with MTM vs 2 matched control subjects (5%) (95% confidence interval, 21%-53%; P = .001). Other histological variables were not significantly different. Two patients had melanomas in situ with subsequent metastasis.

Conclusions  Thin melanomas with extensive regression represent a group at higher risk for the development of metastasis. Furthermore, the risk of metastasis cannot be dismissed in cases of melanoma in situ.


From the Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (Dr Guitart); Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Lowe); Department of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Piepkorn); Department of Pathology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (Dr Prieto); Rabkin Dermatopathology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Rabkin); Department of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago (Dr Ronan); Department of Dermatology, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Shea); Department of Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton (Dr Tron); Department of Pathology, Bowman-Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr White); and Department of Dermatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (Dr Barnhill). Dr Shea is now affiliated with the Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago.
Dr Ronan is deceased.


RELATED ARTICLES

Nodular Type and Older Age as the Most Significant Associations of Thick Melanoma in Victoria, Australia
Alexander J. Chamberlain, Lin Fritschi, Graham G. Giles, John P. Dowling, and John W. Kelly
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(5):609-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thin Melanomas and Regression, Thick Melanomas and Older Men: Prognostic Implications and Perspectives on Secondary Prevention
Marie-France Demierre
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(5):678-682.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(5):707-708.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The correlation of regression in primary melanoma with sentinel lymph node status
Kaur et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;61:297-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Cutaneous Melanoma with Regression Does not Require a Lower Threshold for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Morris et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:316-322.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 2-2007 -- A 49-Year-Old Woman with a Pigmented Lesion on the Arm
Thompson et al.
NEJM 2007;356:285-292.
FULL TEXT  

The Prognostic Importance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma
Ranieri et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:927-932.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Melanoma In Situ: A Survey of US Dermatologists
Charles et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:723-729.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation Between Prognostic Factors and Increasing Age in Melanoma
Chao et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004;11:259-264.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Staging Workup, Sentinel Node Biopsy, and Follow-up Tests for Melanoma: Update of Current Concepts
Johnson et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:107-113.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tumor Lymphangiogenesis: A Novel Prognostic Indicator for Cutaneous Melanoma Metastasis and Survival
Dadras et al.
Am. J. Pathol. 2003;162:1951-1960.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Thin Melanoma
Lowe et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:617-621.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Metastasizing Thin Melanoma or Multiple Primary Melanomas?
Heenan and Taran
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:388-388.
FULL TEXT  

Metastasizing Thin Melanoma or Multiple Primary Melanomas?--Reply
Guitart et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:388-389.
FULL TEXT  

Thin Melanomas: Going, Going, Gone?
Journal Watch Dermatology 2002;2002:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Thin Melanomas and Regression, Thick Melanomas and Older Men: Prognostic Implications and Perspectives on Secondary Prevention
Demierre
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:678-682.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.