This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (23)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dermatologic Disorders  • Quality of Care, Other  • Neoplasms  • Diagnosis  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Janine Wechsler, MD; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, MD, PhD; Alain Spatz, MD; Christiane Bailly, MD; Bernard Cribier, MD, PhD; Lucile Andrac-Meyer, MD; Béatrice Vergier, MD; Sylvie Fraitag, MD; Olivier Verola, MD; Pierre Wolkenstein, MD, PhD; and the French Cutaneous Cancerology Group

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:625-628.

Objective  To assess interrater reliability in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma in children.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We collected 85 slides of melanomas diagnosed in patients younger than 17 years through a network of dermatopathologists and dermatologists. The slides were classified into 3 categories: (1) slides from children with metastatic melanoma; (2) slides from disease-free children with a follow-up of less than 5 years; (3) slides from disease-free children with a follow-up of 5 years or longer. Category 1 was considered the gold standard. Four pairs of expert dermatopathologists reviewed the slides and classified them into melanoma, nevus (including Spitz nevus), or ambiguous tumors.

Intervention  None.

Main Outcome Measure  Concordance between pairs of experts.

Results  For category 1 slides (n = 20), the concordance was weak to moderate. For category 2 slides (n = 47), the concordance was weak. For category 3 slides (n = 18), the concordance was poor to moderate.

Conclusion  This study demonstrates that the reliability of diagnosis of melanoma in childhood is poor, even when submitted to experts.

From the Departments of Pathology at Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil (Dr Wechsler), Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif (Dr Spatz), Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon (Dr Bailly), Hôpital Nord, Marseille (Dr Andrac-Meyer), Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac (Dr Vergier), and Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (Dr Fraitag) and Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris (Dr Verola); the Laboratory of Cutaneous Histopathology, University Hospital, Strasbourg (Dr Cribier); and the Departments of Public Heath (Dr Bastuji-Garin) and Dermatology (Dr Wolkenstein), Université Paris XII, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil (AP-HP), France.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(5):707-708.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neonatal Congenital Malignant Melanoma With Lymph Node Metastasis
McElearney et al.
JCO 2009;27:2726-2728.
FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Melanoma
Lange
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2008;2008:436-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma in Children and Teenagers: An Analysis of Patients From the National Cancer Data Base
Lange et al.
JCO 2007;25:1363-1368.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Melanoma: Risk Factor and Survival Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database
Strouse et al.
JCO 2005;23:4735-4741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Digital Epiluminescence Microscopy to Help Define the Edge of Lentigo Maligna
Robinson
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1095-1100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Histopathologic Recognition of Involved Margins of Lentigo Maligna Excised by Staged Excision: An Interobserver Comparison Study
Florell et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:595-604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Childhood Melanoma: How Will We Ever Know?
Journal Watch Dermatology 2002;2002:3-3.
FULL TEXT