You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 10, October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Anesthesia
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Dermatologic Procedures
 •Dermatologic Laser Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Laser-Assisted Penetration of Topical Anesthetic in Adults

Elma D. Baron, MD; Lisbeth Harris, MSPH; William S. Redpath; Howard Shapiro, PhD; Fred Hetzel, PhD, JD; Grant Morley, MSc, MMedSc; David Bar-Or, MD; Seth R. Stevens, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1288-1290.

Objective  To determine whether pretreatment of skin with erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) laser-assisted delivery facilitates the penetration of lidocaine cream to provide anesthesia suitable for needlesticks after just 5 minutes.

Design  Trial 1 was a double-blind randomized controlled trial, whereas trial 2 was a nonblinded randomized controlled trial.

Setting  The study was conducted in 2 facilities, an academic and a private clinical research unit.

Participants  A total of 320 healthy volunteers, aged 18 to 65 years and of any Fitzpatrick skin phototype.

Interventions  Trial 1 involved an Er:YAG laser pretreatment to disrupt the stratum corneum followed by an application of 4% lidocaine cream on one arm, and a laser pretreatment plus placebo on the other arm. Trial 2 involved an application of 4% lidocaine cream alone on one arm, and a laser pretreatment followed by an application of 4% lidocaine cream on the other arm.

Main Outcome Measure  Self-reported pain perception on a 100-mm visual analog scale after quick insertion and removal of a 25-gauge hypodermic needle on the treatment sites.

Results  Data from the 2 trials showed that there was a 62% pain reduction with laser pretreatment plus lidocaine compared with laser pretreatment plus placebo, and a 61% pain reduction with laser pretreatment plus lidocaine, compared with lidocaine alone. The decrease in pain in both trials was statistically significant (P<.001). Adverse events reported 48 hours after treatment were few and mild.

Conclusion  Treatment with the Er:YAG laser followed by lidocaine cream is a safe, effective, and efficient means of inducing skin anesthesia that significantly reduces the pain of hypodermic needle insertion.


From the Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs Baron and Stevens); the Dermatology Service, Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland (Drs Baron and Stevens); HealthONE Alliance, Denver, Colo (Ms Harris, Mr Redpath, and Drs Shapiro, Hetzel, and Bar-Or); and Norwood Abbey Ltd, Chelsea Heights, Victoria, Australia (Mr Morley). Mr Morley is employed by Norwood Abbey who funded the study and manufactures the device used in this study.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Combination 532-nm and 1064-nm Lasers for Noninvasive Skin Rejuvenation and Toning
Min-Wei Christine Lee
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1265-1276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Full-Face Laser Resurfacing Using a Supplemented Topical Anesthesia Protocol
Suzanne L. Kilmer, Vera Chotzen, Brian D. Zelickson, Marla McClaren, Susan Silva, Jacqueline Calkin, and David No
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1279-1283.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Survey of Patient Experiences After Laser Skin Resurfacing: Results From 21/2 Years of Follow-up
R. Sonia Batra, Carolyn I. Jacob, Lori Hobbs, Kenneth A. Arndt, and Jeffrey S. Dover
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1295-1299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Erbium:YAG Laser and Cultured Epidermis in the Surgical Therapy of Stable Vitiligo
Liliana Guerra, Grazia Primavera, Desanka Raskovic, Graziella Pellegrini, Osvaldo Golisano, Sergio Bondanza, Patrizia Paterna, Giulio Sonego, Tommaso Gobello, Francesco Atzori, Paolo Piazza, Antonio Luci, and Michele De Luca
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1303-1310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laser-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses
Macrene R. Alexiades-Armenakas and Roy G. Geronemus
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1313-1320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New CME Format Online
Andrew Samel
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1351.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Energy Delivery Devices for Cutaneous Remodeling: Lasers, Lights, and Radio Waves
Murad Alam, Jeffrey S. Dover, and Kenneth A. Arndt
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1351-1360.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Nasolabial Folds and Jowls With a Noninvasive Radiofrequency Device
Laurie G. S. Jacobson, Macrene Alexiades-Armenakas, Leonard Bernstein, and Roy G. Geronemus
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(10):1371-1372.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pharmacologic Approaches for Reducing Venous Access Pain in Children
Zempsky
Pediatrics 2008;122:S140-S153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pain Reduction During Pediatric Immunizations: Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations
Schechter et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e1184-e1198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery at Two Output Energies for Enhancing the Delivery of Topically Applied LMX-4(R) Cream Prior to Venipuncture
Koh et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2007;104:847-849.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Energy Delivery Devices for Cutaneous Remodeling: Lasers, Lights, and Radio Waves
Alam et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:1351-1360.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.