You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 11, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Vascular Malformations
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Treatment of Venous Malformations With Sclerosant in Microfoam Form

Juan Cabrera, MD; Juan Cabrera, Jr, MPharm; Ma Antonia García-Olmedo, DPharm; Pedro Redondo, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1409-1416.

Background  Treatment of congenital venous malformations poses a major clinical challenge. Surgery is difficult and frequently unsuccessful, radiological intervention with embolization has an ill-defined role, and conventional sclerotherapy has little to offer.

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sclerosant in microfoam form in treating congenital venous malformations.

Design  A retrospective study of medical records, pretreatment and posttreatment color photographs, echo-Doppler ultrasonographic results, and/or magnetic resonance imaging in patients with congenital vascular malformations of venous predominance. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 103 months (mean, 30 months).

Setting  Private vascular surgery clinic in Granada, Spain, and dermatology department at a university hospital in Pamplona.

Patients  The study population comprised 50 patients, 19 with limited venous malformations, 16 with infiltrating venous malformations, and 15 with Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome.

Intervention  Percutaneous sclerotherapy by direct injection of 0.25% to 4% polidocanol microfoam under du-plex ultrasonographic guidance. The number of sessions varied between 1 and 46 (mean, 12 sessions).

Main Outcome Measure  The primary efficacy end point was defined as a reduction in size after completion of the treatment.

Results  Sclerosis therapy with polidocanol microfoam was judged beneficial in 46 (92%) of the 50 patients. Among the 46 responders, 18 showed disappearance of treated malformations, 15 showed a reduction in malformation size of more than 50%, and 13 showed a reduction in malformation size of 50% or less. Of the 39 patients who presented with pain, the pain disappeared in 25 and was reduced in 14. No major adverse effects were reported by any patient. There were 4 cases of transient skin pigmentation and 3 cases of skin necrosis.

Conclusions  Color echo-Doppler ultrasonography–guided sclerotherapy with polidocanol microfoam was effective in 46 (92%) of the patients. The technique is delivered on a strictly ambulatory basis and has proved simple and innocuous. The quality and durability of the outcome make this novel procedure the treatment of choice in the care of patients with congenital venous malformations.


From the Vascular Surgery Clinic, Granada, Spain (Drs J. Cabrera and García-Olmedo and Mr J. Cabrera Jr; and the Department of Dermatology, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (Dr Redondo). The microfoam presented in the study was the subject of a patent application by the authors in 1993, and they have subsequently assigned the patents to BTG International Limited, London, England. Provensis Ltd, London, a subsidiary of BTG International Limited, has developed the patented microfoam concept into a pharmaceutical product, Varisolve, which is undergoing clinical trials in Europe and the United States.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Foam Sclerotherapy: A New Era
Te-Shao Hsu and Robert A. Weiss
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(11):1494-1496.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Efficacy and Safety of Microfoam Sclerotherapy in a Patient With Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome and a Patent Foramen Ovale
Redondo et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:1147-1151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Side-effects and complications of foam sclerotherapy of the great and small saphenous veins: a controlled multicentre prospective study including 1025 patients
Gillet et al.
Phlebology 2009;24:131-138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventional Neuroradiology of the Head and Neck
Gandhi et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1806-1815.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Hidden Face of Venous Malformations: A Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approach
Redondo
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:922-926.
FULL TEXT  

Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Polidocanol Microfoam in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers
Cabrera et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:667-673.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Polidocanol Microfoam for Vascular Malformations
Journal Watch Dermatology 2003;2003:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Foam Sclerotherapy: A New Era
Hsu and Weiss
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:1494-1496.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.