You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 5, May 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Allergy
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Immunotherapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Double-blind Randomized Trial of 0.1% Tacrolimus vs 0.05% Clobetasol for the Treatment of Childhood Vitiligo

Veronica Lepe, MD; Benjamin Moncada, MD; Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cazares, MD; Maria Bertha Torres-Alvarez, MD; Carlos A. Ortiz; Antonio B. Torres-Rubalcava, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:581-585.

Objective  To assess the safety and efficacy of topical 0.1% tacrolimus vs 0.05% clobetasol propionate.

Design  Randomized double-blind trial.

Setting  Department of Dermatology, Hospital Central "Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto," San Luis Potosí, México.

Participants  From 20 children with vitiligo, 2 symmetrical lesions of about the same size and evolution time were selected. They were devoid of any topical or systemic therapy for 2 months prior to inclusion.

Interventions  Treatment with topical tacrolimus and clobetasol for a 2-month period.

Main Outcomes Measures  The grade of repigmentation was evaluated by color slides at baseline and again at every 2-week visit. The slides were analyzed by 2 clinicians unrelated to the study and by a morphometric digitalized computer program. Characteristics of pigment, time of response, symptoms, telangiectasias, and atrophy were evaluated every 2 weeks.

Results  Eighteen (90%) of the 20 patients experienced some repigmentation. The mean percentage of repigmentation was 49.3% for clobetasol and 41.3% for tacrolimus. Lesions in 3 patients using clobetasol presented atrophy, and 2 lesions incurred telangiectasias; tacrolimus caused a burning sensation in 2 lesions.

Conclusions  Tacrolimus proved almost as effective as clobetasol propionate to restore skin color in lesions of vitiligo in children. Because it does not produce atrophy or other adverse effects, tacrolimus may be very useful for younger patients and for sensitive areas of the skin such as eyelids, and it should be considered in other skin disorders currently treated with topical steroids for prolonged periods.


From the Dermatology Department, Hospital Central "Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto" (Drs Lepe, Moncada, Castanedo-Cazares, and Torres-Alvarez), Public Health Department (Dr Torres-Rubalcava), School of Medicine, and the Graphic Design School (Mr Ortiz), Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED LETTER

Lack of Efficacy of Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Vitiligo in the Absence of UV-B Exposure
Nima Ostovari, Thierry Passeron, Jean-Philippe Lacour, and Jean-Paul Ortonne
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(2):252-253.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Successful Treatment of Vitiligo With 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment
Lisa B. Travis, Jeffrey M. Weinberg, and Nanette B. Silverberg
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(5):571-574.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Childhood Vitiligo and Tacrolimus: Immunomodulating Treatment for an Autoimmune Disease
Heidi Plettenberg, Till Assmann, and Thomas Ruzicka
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(5):651-654.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Little white spots: an approach to hypopigmented macules
Lio
EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2008;93:98-102.
FULL TEXT  

Vitiligo: To Treat or Not to Treat
Lim and Hexsel
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:643-646.
FULL TEXT  

Lack of Efficacy of Tacrolimus in the Treatment of Vitiligo in the Absence of UV-B Exposure.
Ostovari et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:252-253.
FULL TEXT  

Tacrolimus for Vitiligo
Dubik
AAP Grand Rounds 2005;13:27-28.
FULL TEXT  

Topical Tacrolimus and the 308-nm Excimer Laser: A Synergistic Combination for the Treatment of Vitiligo
Passeron et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1065-1069.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parametric Modeling of Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy for Vitiligo Using a Novel Quantitative Tool: The Vitiligo Area Scoring Index
Hamzavi et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:677-683.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editors' Reply
AAP Grand Rounds 2003;10:66-67.
FULL TEXT  

Tacrolimus Treatment of Vitiligo in Childhood
JWatch Pediatrics 2003;2003:8-8.
 

Treatment of Childhood Vitiligo
Krowchuk
AAP Grand Rounds 2003;10:21-21.
FULL TEXT  

Tacrolimus Treatment of Vitiligo in Childhood
Journal Watch Dermatology 2003;2003:10-10.
FULL TEXT  

Childhood Vitiligo and Tacrolimus: Immunomodulating Treatment for an Autoimmune Disease
Plettenberg et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:651-654.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.