 |
 |

Long-term Outcome of 525 Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome
Clinical Prognostic Factors and Risk for Disease Progression
Youn H. Kim, MD;
Howard L. Liu, MD;
Serena Mraz-Gernhard, MD;
Anna Varghese, BA;
Richard T. Hoppe, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:857-866.
Objectives To study and update the clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of our patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), and to identify important clinical factors predictive of survival and disease progression.
Design A single-center, retrospective cohort analysis.
Setting Academic referral center for cutaneous lymphoma.
Patients Five hundred twenty-five patients with MF and SS evaluated and managed at Stanford University Cutaneous Lymphoma Clinic, Stanford, Calif, from 1958 through 1999.
Main Outcome Measures We calculated long-term actuarial overall and disease-specific survivals and disease progression by the Kaplan-Meier method, and relative risk (RR) for survival calculated from expected survivals in control populations.
Results The majority of our patients presented with T1 (30%) or T2 (37%) disease; 18% presented with T3 and 15% with T4 skin involvement. Forty-three percent of deaths were attributable to MF, primarily in patients with T3 or T4 disease. The patients with a more advanced T classification and clinical stage had a worse survival outcome. Except for patients with T1 or stage IA disease, the RR for death is greater in patients with MF than in a control population (RR, 2.2 in stage IB/IIA disease, 3.9 in stage IIB/III disease, and 12.8 in stage IV disease). Despite similar overall survival in patients with stage IB or IIA disease, their disease-specific survivals were significantly different (P = .006). The most significant clinical prognostic factors in the univariate analysis were patient age, TNM and B classifications, overall clinical stage groupings, and the presence or absence of extracutaneous disease. In the multivariate analysis, patient age, T classification, and the presence of extracutaneous disease were the most important independent factors. The risk for disease progression to a more advanced TNM or B classification, worse clinical stage, or death due to MF correlated with the severity of the initial T classification. The risk for development of extracutaneous disease also correlated with T classification; none of these patients had T1 disease when their extracutaneous disease was detected.
Conclusions Patients with MF and SS have varying risks for disease progression or death. The most important clinical predictive factors for survival include patient age, T classification, and the presence of extracutaneous disease. The significant disease-specific survival differences between different clinical stages validate the usefulness of the present MF clinical staging system of the National Cancer Institute.
From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Kim, Liu, and Mraz-Gernhard and Ms Varghese) and Radiation Oncology (Dr Hoppe), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
RELATED ARTICLES
skINsight Starts
James M. Grichnik and Kenneth A. Arndt
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(7):926.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Memorials and Mandates for Cutaneous Lymphomas
Peter W. Heald
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(7):926-928.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Lesional gene expression profiling in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma reveals natural clusters associated with disease outcome
Shin et al.
Blood 2007;110:3015-3027.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
Olsen et al.
Blood 2007;110:1713-1722.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Phase IIB Multicenter Trial of Vorinostat in Patients With Persistent, Progressive, or Treatment Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Olsen et al.
JCO 2007;25:3109-3115.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
TNM classification system for primary cutaneous lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
Kim et al.
Blood 2007;110:479-484.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Second Lymphomas and Other Malignant Neoplasms in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome: Evidence From Population-Based and Clinical Cohorts
Huang et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:45-50.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Analysis of T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangement for Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparison of Southern Blot and Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
Juarez et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1107-1113.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Beyond Clonal Detection: Defining the T-Cell Clone
Guitart
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1159-1160.
FULL TEXT
WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas
Willemze et al.
Blood 2005;105:3768-3785.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Mycosis Fungoides-Type Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma and Neutrophilic Dermatosis
Franck et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:353-356.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Early TCR-{beta} and TCR-{gamma} PCR detection of T-cell clonality indicates minimal tumor disease in lymph nodes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: diagnostic and prognostic implications
Assaf et al.
Blood 2005;105:503-510.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Transition of Sezary syndrome into mycosis fungoides after complete clinical and molecular remission under extracorporeal photophoresis
Assaf et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;57:1325-1328.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical and Pathological Features of Posttransplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorders Presenting With Skin Involvement in 4 Patients
Beynet et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1140-1146.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Pathogenesis of Mycosis Fungoides
Girardi et al.
NEJM 2004;350:1978-1988.
FULL TEXT
Memorials and Mandates for Cutaneous Lymphomas
Heald
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:926-928.
FULL TEXT
|