 |
 |

Successful Treatment of Anogenital Lichen Sclerosus With Topical Tacrolimus
Markus Böhm, MD;
Uta Frieling, MD;
Thomas A. Luger, MD;
Gisela Bonsmann, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:922-924.
Background Lichen sclerosus of the anogenital area is a chronic inflammatory and fibrosclerotic disease associated with substantial morbidity. Topical ultrapotent corticosteroids are currently the treatment of choice.
Observations Three prepubertal girls and 3 adults (2 men, 1 woman) were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment once daily. All patients experienced complete resolution with long-lasting remission for up to 1 year. No major adverse effects were observed, and treatment was well tolerated.
Conclusions Topical tacrolimus is a promising novel agent in the treatment of lichen sclerosus of the anogenital area. A major advantage over topical corticosteroids is the lack of skin atrophy. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm our findings.
From the Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
RELATED ARTICLE
Successful Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus With Topical Tacrolimus
Rainer Kunstfeld, Reinhard Kirnbauer, Georg Stingl, and Franz M. Karlhofer
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(7):850-852.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Progressive Extragenital Lichen Sclerosus Successfully Treated With Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy
Colbert et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:19-20.
FULL TEXT
Topical Tacrolimus: An Effective Therapy for Zoon Balanitis
Santos-Juanes et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1538-1539.
FULL TEXT
Topical Tacrolimus, Genital Lichen Sclerosus, and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Bunker et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1169-1169.
FULL TEXT
Does Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Influence Its Prognosis?
Cooper et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:702-706.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Effect of Long-term Topical Application of a Potent Steroid on the Course of the Disease
Renaud-Vilmer et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:709-712.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|