You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 1, January 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neoplasms
 •Phototherapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Photodynamic Therapy of Multiple Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers With Verteporfin and Red Light–Emitting Diodes

Two-Year Results Evaluating Tumor Response and Cosmetic Outcomes

Harvey Lui, MD; Lori Hobbs, MD; Whitney D. Tope, MPhil, MD; Peter K. Lee, MD, PhD; Craig Elmets, MD; Nathalie Provost, MD; Agnes Chan, PhD; Herma Neyndorff; Xiang Yao Su, PhD; Hem Jain, MD; Iltefat Hamzavi, MD; David McLean, MD; Robert Bissonnette, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:26-32.

Background  Efficient treatment of patients with multiple synchronous nonmelanoma skin cancers represents a therapeutic challenge.

Objective  To study the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin and red light in the treatment of multiple nonmelanoma skin cancers.

Design  Open-label, randomized, multicenter, dose-ranging phase 2 study conducted at 4 North American university-based dermatology clinics.

Patients  Fifty-four patients with 421 multiple nonmelanoma skin cancers including superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen disease).

Methods  A single intravenous infusion of 14 mg/m2 of verteporfin followed 1 to 3 hours later by exposure of tumors to 60, 120, or 180 J/cm2 of red light (688 ± 10 nm) from a light-emitting diode panel.

Main Outcome Measures  Pathologic response of treated sites was assessed at 6 months. Clinical and cosmetic responses were assessed and graded at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after verteporfin PDT, with optional follow-up visits at 12, 18, and 24 months.

Results  The histopathologic response, defined as absence of tumor on biopsy specimens 6 months after verteporfin PDT, ranged from 69% at 60 J/cm2 to 93% at 180 J/cm2. At 24 months of follow-up (276 tumors in 31 patients), the clinical complete response rate ranged from 51% at 60 J/cm2 to 95% at 180 J/cm2. No significant systemic adverse events were observed; most events occurred at the treated tumor sites and included events such as pain. Overall, 65% (95% confidence interval, 58%-71%) of tumors were judged to have good to excellent cosmesis at 24 months.

Conclusion  A single course of verteporfin PDT showed treatment benefit for patients with multiple nonmelanoma skin cancers.


From the Division of Dermatology, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver (Drs Lui, Hobbs, Jain, Hamzavi, and McLean); Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Drs Tope and Lee); Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Dr Elmets); Division of Dermatology, University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Quebec (Drs Provost and Bissonnette); and QLT Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia (Drs Chan and Su and Ms Neyndorff). Drs Lui, McLean, and Bissonnette have served as paid consultants for QLT Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia. Dr Tope was paid by QLT to attend investigators' meetings and to testify for QLT at the US Food and Drug administration on the present data. Drs Chan and Su and Ms Neyndorff are employees of QLT and hold stock and/or stock options in the company. Dr Hamzavi received funds from QLT for travel expenses to an investigators' meeting and to conduct a phase 3 trial related to data in this study.


RELATED ARTICLES

Photodynamic Therapy for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer—and More?
Colin A. Morton
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(1):116-120.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Photodynamic Therapy Using Topical Methyl Aminolevulinate vs Surgery for Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial
Lesley E. Rhodes, Menno de Rie, Ylva Enström, Richard Groves, Tore Morken, Victoria Goulden, Gavin A. E. Wong, Jean-Jacques Grob, Sandeep Varma, and Peter Wolf
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(1):17-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Trial of Short Incubation, Broad-Area Photodynamic Therapy for Facial Actinic Keratoses and Diffuse Photodamage
Dany Touma, Mina Yaar, Sara Whitehead, Nellie Konnikov, and Barbara A. Gilchrest
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(1):33-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Photodynamic Therapy With Aminolevulinic Acid Topical Solution and Visible Blue Light in the Treatment of Multiple Actinic Keratoses of the Face and Scalp: Investigator-Blinded, Phase 3, Multicenter Trials
Daniel J. Piacquadio, Diana M. Chen, Harold F. Farber, Joseph F. Fowler, Jr, Scott D. Glazer, J. John Goodman, Luciann L. Hruza, Edward W. B. Jeffes, Mark R. Ling, Tania J. Phillips, Tena M. Rallis, Richard K. Scher, Charles R. Taylor, and Gerald David Weinstein
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(1):41-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Photodynamic Therapy in Oncology
Triesscheijn et al.
The Oncologist 2006;11:1034-1044.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benzethonium Chloride: A Novel Anticancer Agent Identified by Using a Cell-Based Small-Molecule Screen.
Yip et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:5557-5569.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Photodynamic Therapy for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer--and More?
Morton
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:116-120.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.