This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (16)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dermatologic Disorders  • Nevi  • Dermatologic Procedures  • Dermatologic Procedures, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

June K. Robinson, MD; Brian J. Nickoloff, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:49-56.

Objective  To examine the outcome of digital epiluminescence microscopic (DELM) surveillance of atypical nevi in a high-risk population for 4 years.

Design  Atypical, flat melanocytic lesions in 100 patients at high risk of developing melanoma were followed annually with DELM. Pigmentary changes or an increase in DELM diameter of 1 mm or greater was an indication to perform an excisional biopsy.

Setting  Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center Melanoma Program, Loyola University Health System, Maywood.

Patients  A consecutive sample of 3482 lesions from 100 patients (aged 18-65 years) with at least 2 images of the same lesion.

Main Outcome Measures  The DELM change was confirmed by histopathologic examination. Patient confidence in and comfort with dermatologic surveillance and skin self-examination performance were assessed.

Results  During annual surveillance with DELM, 5.5% of the lesions changed. Among the 193 excisional biopsy specimens there were 4 melanomas in situ, 169 dysplastic nevi, and 20 common nevi. Confidence in and comfort with surveillance and skin self-examination improved after DELM.

Conclusions  The criteria applied to detect substantial DELM changes were an increase in DELM diameter of 1 mm or greater and pigmentary changes, including radial streaming, focal enlargement, peripheral black dots, and "clumping" within the irregular pigment network. Use of DELM enhanced confidence in and comfort with care, which extended to performing more extensive skin self-examination.

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology (Dr Robinson), and Department of Pathology (Drs Robinson and Nickoloff), Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Ill. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of the Optimal Interval for and Sensitivity of Short-term Sequential Digital Dermoscopy Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Melanoma
Altamura et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:502-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin Lesions
Benvenuto-Andrade et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:329-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of a Partner Assistance Intervention Designed to Increase Skin Self-examination Performance
Robinson et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:37-41.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging.
Kittler et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1113-1119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Skills training to learn discrimination of ABCDE criteria by those at risk of developing melanoma.
Robinson and Turrisi
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:447-452.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ABCDE--An Evolving Concept in the Early Detection of Melanoma
Rigel et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1032-1034.
FULL TEXT  

Limitations of Dermoscopy in the Recognition of Melanoma
Skvara et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:155-160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT