 |
|
Vascular Structures in Skin Tumors
A Dermoscopy Study
Giuseppe Argenziano, MD;
Iris Zalaudek, MD;
Rosamaria Corona, DSc, MD;
Francesco Sera, DStat;
Lorenza Cicale, MD;
Gianluca Petrillo, MD;
Eleonora Ruocco, MD;
Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof, MD;
H. Peter Soyer, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:1485-1489.
Objectives To describe the different vascular structures seen by dermoscopy and to evaluate their association with various melanocytic and nonmelanocytic skin tumors in a large series of cases.
Design Digital dermoscopic images of the lesions were evaluated for the presence of various morphologic types of vessels.
Setting Specialized university clinic.
Patients From a larger database, 531 excised lesions (from 517 patients) dermoscopically showing any type of vascular structures were included.
Main Outcome Measures The frequency and positive predictive value of the different vascular structures seen in various tumors were calculated, and the differences were evaluated by the  2 or Fisher exact test.
Results Arborizing vessels were seen in 82.1% of basal cell carcinomas, with a 94.1% positive predictive value (P<.001). Dotted vessels were generally predictive for a melanocytic lesion (90.0%, P<.001), and were especially seen in Spitz nevi (77.8% of lesions). In melanoma, linear-irregular, dotted, and polymorphous/atypical vessels were the most frequent vascular structures, whereas milky-red globules/areas were the most predictive ones (77.8%, P = .003). The presence of erythema was most predictive for Clark nevus, whereas comma, glomerular, crown, and hairpin vessels were significantly associated with dermal/congenital nevi, Bowen disease, sebaceous hyperplasia, and seborrheic keratosis, respectively (P<.001 for all).
Conclusions Different morphologic types of vessels are associated with different melanocytic or nonmelanocytic skin tumors. Therefore, the recognition of distinctive vascular structures may be helpful for diagnostic purposes, especially when the classic pigmented dermoscopic structures are lacking.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Dermatology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy (Drs Argenziano, Cicale, Petrillo, and Ruocco), and Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Drs Zalaudek, Hofmann-Wellenhof, and Soyer); and Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata, Rome, Italy (Drs Corona and Sera).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Transillumination as a Means to Differentiate Melanocytic Lesions Based on Their Vascularity
Terushkin et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:1060-1062.
FULL TEXT
Dermoscopic Evaluation of Amelanotic and Hypomelanotic Melanoma
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1120-1127.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Dermoscopy and the Diagnostic Challenge of Amelanotic and Hypomelanotic Melanoma
Stoecker and Stolz
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1207-1210.
FULL TEXT
Time Required for a Complete Skin Examination With and Without Dermoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study
Zalaudek et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:509-513.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Dermoscopy of Dermatofibromas: A Prospective Morphological Study of 412 Cases
Zaballos et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:75-83.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Dermoscopy Patterns of Eczemalike Melanoma
Giacomel et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1081-1082.
FULL TEXT
Pigmented Mammary Paget Disease: Dermoscopic, In Vivo Reflectance-Mode Confocal Microscopic, and Immunohistochemical Study of a Case
Longo et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:752-754.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Dermoscopy of Solitary Angiokeratomas: A Morphological Study
Zaballos et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:318-325.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Dermoscopy patterns of fibroepithelioma of pinkus.
Zalaudek et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1318-1322.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
