You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Observation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Telemedicine
 •Law and Medicine
 •Dermatologic Procedures, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Photographic Images, Digital Imaging, Dermatology, and the Law

Noah Scheinfeld, MD, JD

Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:473-476.

Background  Patient photographic images play an important role in dermatological record keeping and training. An assessment of the legal implications of image taking is necessary to use images properly.

Observations  Images are parts of the medical record and must be treated with the same care as written medical records. Because multiple digital images are sometimes taken and digital images can be easily manipulated, they present novel issues in this regard. Images can be used as evidence in court. Issues regarding digital images include (1) authentication, (2) manipulation, (3) audit trail verification, and (4) data compression. The Health Information Portability and Accountability Act requires that health care providers control and track those who have access to identifiable digital medical information. This should facilitate the use of digital images as evidence because the provenance of digital images can be established. The Health Information Portability and Accountability Act covers the use and disclosure of protected health information, such as "full-face photographic images and any comparable images." To publish identifiable digital images (images of the face), it seems prudent for patients to waive in writing their rights to this protected health information.

Conclusion  Images will continue to enhance dermatological care, and understanding and accounting for the legal underpinnings of their use is prudent.


From the Department of Dermatology, St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY. The author has no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED ARTICLE

Digital Photography, Confidentiality, and Teledermatology
David J. Goldberg
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(4):477-478.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Digital Photography, Confidentiality, and Teledermatology
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:477-478.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.