You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 6, June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Evidence-Based Dermatology: Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Neoplasms
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Validity of Patient Self-reported History of Skin Cancer

Michael E. Ming, MD, MSCE; Ross M. Levy, MD; Ole J. Hoffstad, MA; Jennifer Filip, BA; Phyllis A. Gimotty, PhD; David J. Margolis, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:730-735.

Objective  To determine the validity of patient self-report of skin cancer history.

Design  A cohort of patients was randomly selected from the case group in a prior case-control study involving skin cancer, and a second cohort was randomly selected from the controls of that study. Patient self-reported history (as determined by responses to a survey) was compared with the gold standard of chart documentation of a pathology report or a procedure note from Mohs micrographic surgery demonstrating skin cancer.

Setting  University-based outpatient dermatology clinic.

Patients  Three hundred patients were selected.

Main Outcome Measures  Patients were considered to have correctly classified their skin cancer history if their self-reported history was consistent with chart documentation.

Results  We obtained chart information for 258 patients.Of those patients, 183 (70.9%) had chart documentation of nonmelanoma skin cancer, and 16 (6.2%) had chart documentation of a melanoma. Using chart documentation as the gold standard, we found that patients correctly identified their basal cell carcinoma status in 84.3% of cases; their squamous cell carcinoma status in 81.5% of cases; their overall nonmelanoma skin cancer status in 91.8% of cases; their melanoma status in 94.8% of cases; and their overall skin cancer status in 92.6% of cases. Patients' self-reported history of skin cancer of any type had a positive predictive value of 95.1% and a negative predictive value of 85.9%.

Conclusions  Self-reported history of skin cancer had a high degree of sensitivity and specificity and a high positive and negative predictive value within the study population. Obtaining medical information by patient report appears to be a useful tool for determining medical history of skin cancer.


From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Ming, Levy, and Margolis) and Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Drs Gimotty and Margolis, Mr Hoffstad, and Ms Filip), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk Group, Skin Lesion History, and Sun Sensitivity Reliability in Squamous Cell Skin Cancer Progression.
Clouser et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2292-2297.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.