You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 8, August 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Vascular Malformations
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Vascular Anomalies

Findings of a Multidisciplinary Vascular Anomalies Clinic

Erin F. D. Mathes, MD; Anita N. Haggstrom, MD; Christopher Dowd, MD; William Y. Hoffman, MD; Ilona J. Frieden, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:979-983.

Objective  To describe the scope of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Vascular Anomalies Clinic (VAC), including the types of diagnoses, characteristics, and management of patients seen in the clinic.

Design  Case series.

Setting  Referral, outpatient, multidisciplinary clinic in a university system.

Patients  Consecutive sample of 175 patients seen in the VAC at UCSF from January 2001 to July 2003.

Main Outcome Measures  Diagnosis before and after clinic visit, symptoms, treatment recommendations, age of onset, age at clinic visit, location of lesion, sex, and type of referring physician.

Results  A total of 96% of patients had cutaneous involvement, 71% of patients had vascular malformations, and 14% had infantile hemangiomas. Fifty-eight percent of patients were referred from outside the UCSF system.Of the patients who had not been previously seen by members of the VAC team or UCSF dermatologists, only 22% had been assigned correct specific diagnoses before coming to the VAC, and 13% had incorrect specific diagnoses before coming to the VAC. Fifty-six percent of vascular malformations were first noted at birth and 17% were noted at later than 10 years of age. Eighty-seven percent of patients were symptomatic from their vascular lesion. Sixty-six percent of patients underwent prior magnetic resonance imaging of their lesion. Further diagnostic workup was recommended in 43% of cases, and treatment recommendations were made in 83% of cases.

Conclusions  Significant confusion still exists regarding the appropriate terminology, diagnosis, and management of vascular anomalies. Multidisciplinary clinics effectively address these complicated and troubling disorders by providing accurate diagnoses, clear treatment recommendations, and counseling from a team of specialists.


From the University of California San Francisco Medical School (Dr Mathes), and Departments of Dermatology (Drs Haggstrom and Frieden), Radiology (Dr Dowd), and Pediatric Surgery (Dr Hoffman), University of California, San Francisco. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED ARTICLE

Cutaneous Manifestations of Proteus Syndrome: Correlations With General Clinical Severity
Diem Nguyen, Joyce T. Turner, Cara Olsen, Leslie G. Biesecker, and Thomas N. Darling
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(8):947-953.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Histopathological reporting of paediatric cutaneous vascular anomalies in relation to proposed multidisciplinary classification system
Al-Adnani et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2006;59:1278-1282.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.