You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 10, October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Eosinophilic Folliculitis

Before and After the Introduction of Antiretroviral Therapy

Priya M. Rajendran, BS; Jacqueline C. Dolev, MD; Michael R. Heaphy, Jr, MD; Toby Maurer, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1227-1231.

Objective  To characterize the relationship of new eosinophilic folliculitis (EF) cases between June 30, 1994, and January 5, 2000, and antiretroviral therapy (ART) status and immune reconstitution.

Design  Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting  Dermatology clinics at a county hospital.

Subjects  Fifty-seven consecutive subjects with biopsy-proved EF from the pathology database. Subject groups were as follows: naïve to ART, receiving ART without protease inhibitors/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and receiving ART containing protease inhibitors/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Main Outcome Measures  Onset of EF, CD4 cell count and nadir at EF onset, and time of ART initiation.

Results  Among the 3 groups previously described, mean CD4 cell counts (86.26/µL vs 113.82/µL vs 145.65/µL, respectively [Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, P = .15]) and nadir (68.43/µL vs 66.18/µL vs 64.17/µL, respectively [Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, P = .41]) at EF diagnosis were not statistically different. Fifty-two subjects (91%), regardless of treatment group, had a nadir below 200/µL. Of the subjects undergoing ART, 28 (82%) developed EF within 6 months of initiating ART; their average CD4 cell count increase was 108/µL. Of the 23 subjects receiving protease inhibitor/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–containing ART regimens, 17 (74%) were diagnosed as having EF within 3 months, with 4 additional subjects diagnosed as having EF within 6 months (a total of 21 [91%] of the 23 subjects). This is not significantly different from the 7 (64%) of 11 subjects diagnosed as having EF at 3 and 6 months of starting ART without protease inhibitors/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (P = .07) (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-1.54).

Conclusions  Our study shows an association between low nadir (66.28/µL) and low CD4 cell count (115.54/µL) and the development of EF, regardless of subjects’ ART status. However, most subjects receiving ART were diagnosed as having EF within 3 to 6 months of ART initiation, regardless of the regimen.


Author Affiliations: School of Medicine (Ms Rajendran) and Departments of Dermatology (Drs Dolev and Maurer) and Pathology (Dr Heaphy), University of California, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

HIV Eosinophilic Folliculitis in Uganda.
Colebunders et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:934-934.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.