You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 11, November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Review
 •Wound Healing
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Topical Negative Pressure Devices

Use for Enhancement of Healing Chronic Wounds

Miki Shirakawa, MD; R. Rivkah Isseroff, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1449-1453.

Chronic wounds present a significant challenge, because there are few available treatment options for timely healing. Topical negative pressure devices have been used in a number of different types of wounds, including chronic wounds. They are believed to hasten wound healing by (1) maintaining a moist environment, (2) removing wound exudates, (3) increasing local blood flow, (4) increasing granulation tissue formation, (5) applying mechanical pressure to promote wound closure, and (6) reducing bacterial loads in the wound. Multiple nonrandomized, noncontrolled studies have reported that the use of these devices results in faster healing times and more successful closures. Five small randomized, controlled trials have also shown favorable outcomes with the use of topical negative pressure devices compared with conventional treatment. Adverse effects include discomfort, pain, and excessive tissue growth into the dressing. Complications are limited if the device is used properly. In light of the current treatment options, topical negative pressure devices may be considered useful as adjuvant therapy for chronic wounds; however, there is inadequate definitive evidence that wound healing is substantially better with these devices than with traditional therapy.


Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, and Wound Healing Clinic, Sacramento Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mather, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Imiquimod Treatment of Exuberant Granulation Tissue in a Nonhealing Diabetic Ulcer
Edward L. Lain and Patrick R. Carrington
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(11):1368-1370.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Short-Contact Topical Tretinoin Therapy for Foot Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes
Wynnis L. Tom, David H. Peng, Atabak Allaei, Daniel Hsu, and Tissa R. Hata
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(11):1373-1377.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Successful Treatment of Trigeminal Trophic Syndrome in a 6-Year-Old Boy With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Fredeking and Silverman
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:984-986.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.