You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neoplasms
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Association of UV Index, Latitude, and Melanoma Incidence in Nonwhite Populations—US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, 1992 to 2001

Melody J. Eide, MD, MPH; Martin A. Weinstock, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:477-481.

Objective  To estimate the association between UV index, latitude, and melanoma incidence in different racial and ethnic populations in a high-quality national data set.

Design  Descriptive study.

Setting  Eleven US cancer registries that constitute the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER-11).

Patients  Patients with malignant melanoma of the skin reported between 1992 and 2001.

Main Outcome Measures  Pearson correlation coefficients and regression coefficients were used to estimate the relationship of age-adjusted melanoma incidence rates (2000 US standard population) with the UV index or latitude within racial and ethnic groups.

Results  A higher mean UV index was significantly associated with an increase in melanoma incidence only in non-Hispanic whites (r = 0.85, P = .001), although a nonsignificant association was noted in Native Americans (r = 0.42, P = .20).Negative, but not significant, correlations with incidence were observed in blacks (r = –0.53, P = .10), Hispanics (r = –0.43, P = .19), and Asians (r = –0.28, P = .41).Latitude also had a significant correlation with incidence only in non-Hispanic whites (r = –0.85, P = .001). A substantial portion of the variance in registry incidence in non-Hispanic whites could be explained by the UV index (R2 = 0.71, P = .001).

Conclusions  Melanoma incidence is associated with increased UV index and lower latitude only in non-Hispanic whites. No evidence to support the association of UV exposure and melanoma incidence in black or Hispanic populations was found.


Author Affiliations: Department of Community Health, Brown University (Drs Eide and Weinstock); Dermatoepidemiology Unit, Providence VA Medical Center (Drs Eide and Weinstock); and Department of Dermatology, Brown Medical School (Dr Weinstock), Providence, RI.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is sun exposure a major cause of melanoma? Yes
Menzies
BMJ 2008;337:a763-a763.
FULL TEXT  

Sunlight exposure assessment: can we accurately assess vitamin D exposure from sunlight questionnaires?
McCarty
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:1097S-1101S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geographic Variation and Risk of Skin Cancer in US Women: Differences Between Melanoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and Basal Cell Carcinoma
Qureshi et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:501-507.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival for Patients With Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma Among Ethnic Groups: The Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Treatment
Zell et al.
JCO 2008;26:66-75.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.