You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Humanities
 •Medicine and the Media
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Content Analysis of News Coverage of Skin Cancer Prevention and Detection, 1979 to 2003

Jo Ellen Stryker, PhD; Benjamin A. Solky, MD; Karen M. Emmons, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:491-496.

Objective  To analyze newspaper coverage between 1979 and 2003 to understand how print coverage may affect primary and secondary skin cancer prevention in the US population.

Design  Content analysis of 921 skin cancer articles released by the Associated Press during the study period.

Main Outcome Measures  Amount of attention given to primary and secondary prevention practices and to risk communication.

Results  Media attention to skin cancer has not increased since 1986. Neither prevention (31.8% of all stories) nor detection (24.4% of all stories) received as much attention as treatment (47.0% of all stories). Specific sun protection practices were mentioned infrequently. Dermatologic detection (6.6%) or self-detection (5.5%) of skin cancer was rarely discussed. Risk communication about skin cancer was suboptimal: articles rarely presented absolute and relative risk.

Conclusions  The media pay little attention to skin cancer, and, in general, stories do not contain important educational information. Strategies for generating increased media attention are discussed.


Author Affiliations: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health (Drs Stryker and Emmons) and Department of Dermatology, Harvard University School of Medicine (Dr Solky), Boston, Mass. Dr Stryker is now with the Department of Speech Communication, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr Solky is now with the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.


RELATED ARTICLES

The War Against Skin Cancer: The Time for Action Is Now
Varee N. Poochareon and Clay J. Cockerell
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(4):499-501.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Television Stations and Weather Pages Still Reporting the UV Index? A National Media Follow-up Study
Katie R. Brooks, Daniel R. Brooks, Drusilla Hufford, Jason Samenow, and Alan C. Geller
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(4):526.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevention and screening efficacy messages in newspaper accounts of cancer
Moriarty and Stryker
Health Educ Res 2008;23:487-498.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Portrayal of tanning, clothing fashion and shade use in Australian women's magazines, 1987 2005
Dixon et al.
Health Educ Res 2007;0:cym057v1-cym057.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Content analysis of general practitioner-requested lumbar spine X-ray reports
Thompson and Carr
Br. J. Radiol. 2007;80:866-871.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of stage at diagnosis of melanoma among Hispanic, black, and white patients in miami-dade county, Florida.
Hu et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:704-708.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Basal-Cell Carcinoma.
Rubin et al.
NEJM 2005;353:2262-2269.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.