 |
|
Sunscreen Use Related to UV Exposure, Age, Sex, and Occupation Based on Personal Dosimeter Readings and Sun-Exposure Behavior Diaries
Elisabeth Thieden, MSc(Pharm);
Peter A. Philipsen, PhD, MSc(Engin);
Jane Sandby-Møller, MD, PhD;
Hans Christian Wulf, MD, DSc
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:967-973.
Objectives To examine during what behaviors people apply sunscreen and to assess the relationship to UV exposure monitored by personal dosimetry and diaries.
Design Open prospective observational study.
Setting University hospital.
Participants A convenience sample of 340 Danish volunteers: children, adolescents, indoor workers, sun worshippers, golfers, and gardeners (age range, 4-68 years).
Intervention Subjects recorded sunscreen use and sun-exposure behavior in diaries and carried personal, electronic UV dosimeters, measuring time-stamped UV doses continuously, during a median of 119 days covering 346 sun-years (1 sun-year equals 1 subject participating during 1 summer season).
Main Outcome Measures Associations between sunscreen use and age, sex, skin type, occupation, sunburn, UV exposure doses, and behavior; and adequate application density and sun protection factor required to prevent sunburn.
Results There were great variations in sunscreen use, which was highly correlated with risk behavior (sunbathing or exposing the upper body) (r = 0.39; P<.001). Sunscreens were used on a median of 5 days per sun-year (range, 1 day for gardeners to 16 days for sun worshippers). Ten percent of females and 41% of males never used sunscreens. Females used sunscreens more but also had more unprotected risk behavior than males (8 days vs 4 days; P<.001). Sunscreen use was not correlated with age, and children had as much unprotected risk behavior as adults. Sunscreens were used on 86% of the days with risk behavior in southern Europe vs 20% in northern Europe (P<.001). The UV doses were significantly higher on days with sunscreen (P .03) and on sunburn days (P<.001). The median sun protection factor was 10.5. The sun-protecting effect corresponded to an application density of 0.5 mg/cm2.
Conclusion Days with sunscreen correlated not with days without risk behavior, but with days "sunbathing with the intention to tan," indicating that sunscreens were used as tanning aids to avoid sunburn.
Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology D92, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
RELATED ARTICLES
Sun Exposure, Sun Protection, and Vitamin D
June K. Robinson
JAMA. 2005;294(12):1541-1543.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sunscreen, Sun Protection, and Our Many Failures
Mark Naylor and June K. Robinson
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8):1025-1027.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Impact of High-Protection Sunscreens on Sun-Exposure Behavior
Alain Dupuy, Ariane Dunant, Jean-Jacques Grob, and for Réseau d’Epidémiologie en Dermatologie
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8):950-956.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Sunlight exposure assessment: can we accurately assess vitamin D exposure from sunlight questionnaires?
McCarty
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:1097S-1101S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Counterpoint: Sunscreen Use Is a Safe and Effective Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention
Berwick
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1923-1924.
FULL TEXT
Identifying Latent Classes of Adults at Risk for Skin Cancer Based on Constitutional Risk and Sun Protection Behavior
Steffen et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1422-1427.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sun Exposure, Sun Protection, and Vitamin D
Robinson
JAMA 2005;294:1541-1543.
FULL TEXT
Sunscreen, Sun Protection, and Our Many Failures
Naylor and Robinson
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1025-1027.
FULL TEXT
|
