 |
|
Consistent Cutaneous Imaging With Commercial Digital Cameras
Yves Vander Haeghen, PhD;
Jean Marie Naeyaert, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:42-46.
Objective To demonstrate how to improve the reproducibility and accuracy of digital images of the skin taken with commercially available digital cameras by transforming them to a standard color space, sRGB.
Methods Our computer algorithm transforms digital images to the standard sRGB color space. It is based on a card with a number of color squares with known colorimetric properties that is included in the image, thereby removing any ambiguity about the color information in the image. Reproducibility and accuracy of the method were assessed by comparing images of color squares with known colorimetric properties taken with different digital cameras at different exposures and zoom settings.
Results Although calibrated images exhibit markedly improved precision and accuracy compared with noncalibrated images, all variability of the imaging process cannot be eliminated.
Conclusion With a little care and effort, a calibrated color chart, and computer software, it is possible to greatly improve the quality of clinical imaging in dermatology and possibly other fields of medicine.
Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
RELATED ARTICLES
Validating Standardized Acquisition of Digital Dermatologic Images for Use in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Alexa Boer Kimball, Alison Ehrlich, Reva C. Lawrence, Alan N. Moshell, and Maria L. Turner
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(1):110-112.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Case of Undetermined Tropical Ulceration Involving the Nose, Pharynx and Larynx, With Histological Findings
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(1):12-13.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Clinical Image: Archiving Clinical Processes and an Entire Specialty
Ashish C. Bhatia
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(1):96-98.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Clinical Image: Archiving Clinical Processes and an Entire Specialty
Bhatia
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:96-98.
FULL TEXT
|
