You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 6, June 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Evidence-Based Dermatology: Review
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The (Relative) Risks of Using Odds Ratios

Kenneth A. Katz, MD, MSc

Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:761-764.

Odds ratios are commonly presented in the medical literature, including dermatology journals. Even when used appropriately, odds ratios are often difficult to interpret. This article illustrates this problem using an example from the recent dermatology literature. It then reviews the definitions of odds and odds ratio, as well as how odds and odds ratio relate to probability and relative risk. The divergence of odds ratios from relative risks when events are common (occurring in ≥10% of a sample) is explained. Methods to convert odds ratios to relative risks (and the reasons why conversion should be considered) are discussed.


Author Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Errors in the Archives of Dermatology and the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology From January Through December 2003
Julie A. Neville, Wei Lang, and Alan B. Fleischer, Jr
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(6):737-740.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Meta-analysis of binary outcomes from two-by-two tables when the length of follow-up varies and hazards are proportional
Combescure et al.
Stat Methods Med Res 2011;20:531-540.
ABSTRACT  

What Are the Odds?
Grunkemeier and Wu
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83:1240-1244.
FULL TEXT  

Errors in the archives of dermatology and the journal of the american academy of dermatology from january through december 2003.
Neville et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:737-740.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.