You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 7, July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Psoriasis
 •Phototherapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Randomized Double-blind Trial of the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Efficacy of Psoralen–UV-A Therapy vs Narrowband UV-B Therapy

Sami S. Yones, MSc, FCD; Roy A. Palmer, MA, MRCP; Trish T. Garibaldinos, RN; John L. M. Hawk, MD, FRCP

Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:836-842.

Objective  To compare the efficacy of oral psoralen–UV-A (PUVA) therapy with that of narrowband UV-B (NB-UVB) therapy in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

Design  Double-blind randomized study.

Setting  Phototherapy unit in a university hospital.

Patients  Ninety-three patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

Interventions  Twice-weekly NB-UVB or PUVA therapy, starting at 70% of the minimum phototoxic or erythema dose, with 20% incremental increases. Patients were treated until clearance, up to a maximum of 30 sessions; those with clearance were followed up until relapse or for 12 months.

Main Outcome Measures  Proportion of patients achieving clearance, number of treatments to clearance, and, among those with clearance, the proportion remaining in remission at 6 months.

Results  Patients with skin types V and VI had a lower rate of clearance than those with skin types I through IV (24% vs 75%; P = .001). In patients with skin types I through IV, PUVA was significantly more effective than NB-UVB at achieving clearance (84% vs 65%; P = .02). The median number of treatments to clearance was significantly lower in the PUVA group (17.0 vs 28.5; P<.001). More patients treated with PUVA vs NB-UVB were reported to have erythema at some stage during treatment (49% vs 22%; P = .004), although this difference may have been due to ascertainment bias. Six months after the cessation of therapy, 68% of PUVA-treated patients were still in remission vs 35% of NB-UVB–treated patients.

Conclusion  Compared with NB-UVB, PUVA achieves clearance in more patients with fewer treatment sessions and results in longer remissions.


Author Affiliations: Photobiology Unit, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, GKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London, England.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Psoralen and Ultraviolet A Light Therapy for Psoriasis
Stern
NEJM 2007;357:682-690.
FULL TEXT  

PUVA vs. NB-UVB: The Controversy Continues
Journal Watch Dermatology 2006;2006:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.