You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 11, November 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Nevi
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dermoscopic Changes in Acral Melanocytic Nevi During Digital Follow-up

Davide Altamura, MD; Iris Zalaudek, MD; Francesco Sera, DStat; Giuseppe Argenziano, MD; Maria Concetta Fargnoli, MD; Luigi Rossiello, MD; Ketty Peris, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(11):1372-1376.

Objective  To investigate changes in dermoscopic patterns of acquired acral melanocytic nevi (AAMN) over time.

Design  Retrospective analysis of digital dermoscopic follow-up of 230 AAMN located on acral volar skin.

Setting  Outpatient clinics at university dermatology departments.

Patients  A total of 230 AAMN located on the soles (n = 149), fingers (n = 62), and palms (n = 19), of 230 white subjects 14 years or younger (n = 81), 15 to 30 years (n = 72), and older than 30 years (n = 77).

Main Outcome Measure  Comparison of baseline and follow-up dermoscopic patterns.

Results  Individual AAMN had a digital follow-up of 6 months (n = 59), 12 months (n = 74), 18 months (n = 44), and 24 months (n = 53). Baseline dermoscopic images showed the following patterns: parallel furrow (48.8%), latticelike (16.1%), fibrillar (10.9%), nontypical (10.9%), homogeneous (4.8%), globular (3.5%), transition (3.5%), and reticular (2.6%). Dermoscopic changes over time were observed in 42 of the 230 AAMN (18.3%), with the greatest frequency of changes occurring in patients 14 years or younger (23 of 81 lesions; 28.4%) (P = .005). The parallel furrow pattern (25.9%) showed more variations over time than other dermoscopic patterns (11.0%) (P = .004). The frequency of change increased linearly over time (P = .001). Four of 7 clinically regressing nevi showed a homogeneous pattern at the last examination.

Conclusions  Dermoscopic changes of AAMN are most common in subjects younger than 14 years. The parallel furrow pattern appears to be the dermoscopic pattern most subject to change, while the homogeneous pattern may be seen also in AAMN showing clinical and dermoscopic involution.


Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy (Drs Altamura, Fargnoli, and Peris); Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Dr Zalaudek); Public Health Agency of Lazio Region, Rome, Italy (Dr Sera); and Department of Dermatology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy (Drs Argenziano and Rossiello).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Variations in the Dermoscopic Features of Acquired Acral Melanocytic Nevi
Fezal Ozdemir, Isil Kilinc Karaarslan, and Taner Akalin
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(11):1378-1384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dermoscopic Patterns of Acral Melanocytic Nevi: Their Variations, Changes, and Significance
Toshiaki Saida and Hiroshi Koga
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(11):1423-1426.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dermoscopic Patterns of Acral Melanocytic Nevi: Their Variations, Changes, and Significance
Saida and Koga
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1423-1426.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.