You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 10, October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Study
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Wound Healing
 •Dermatologic Procedures
 •Dermatologic Procedures, Other
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Dermabrasion/ Chemical Peels
 •Facial Plastic Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Molecular Analysis of Aggressive Microdermabrasion in Photoaged Skin

Darius J. Karimipour, MD; Laure Rittié, MS, PhD; Craig Hammerberg, MS, PhD; Victoria K. Min, BA; John J. Voorhees, MD; Jeffrey S. Orringer, MD; Dana L. Sachs, MD; Ted Hamilton, MS; Gary J. Fisher, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(10):1114-1122.

Objective  To investigate dermal remodeling effects of crystal-free microdermabrasion on photodamaged skin.

Design  Biochemical analyses of human skin biopsy specimens following microdermabrasion treatment in vivo.

Setting  Academic referral center.

Participants  Volunteer sample of 40 adults, aged 50 to 83 years, with clinically photodamaged forearms.

Intervention  Focal microdermabrasion treatment with diamond-studded handpieces of varying abrasiveness on photodamaged forearms and serial biopsies at baseline and various times after treatment.

Main Outcome Measures  Quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to quantify changes in inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling effectors of normal wound healing. Type I and type III procollagen served as the main outcome marker of dermal remodeling.

Results  Coarse-grit microdermabrasion induces a wound healing response characterized by rapid increase in induction of cytokeratin 16 and activation of the AP-1 transcription factor in the epidermis. Early inflammation was demonstrated by induction of inflammatory cytokines, antimicrobial peptides, and neutrophil infiltration in the dermis. AP-1 activation was followed by matrix metalloproteinase–mediated degradation of extracellular matrix. Consistent with this wound-healing response, we observed significant remodeling of the dermal component of the skin, highlighted by induction of type I and type III procollagen and by induction of collagen production enhancers heat shock protein 47 and prolyl 4-hydroxylase. Dermal remodeling was not achieved when microdermabrasion was performed using a medium-grit handpiece.

Conclusions  Microdermabrasion using a coarse diamond-studded handpiece induces a dermal remodeling cascade similar to that seen in incisional wound healing. Optimization of these molecular effects is likely the result of more aggressive treatment with a more abrasive handpiece.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00111254


Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan (Drs Karimipour, Rittié, Hammerberg, Voorhees, Orringer, Sachs, and Fisher and Mr Hamilton), and University of Michigan Medical School (Ms Min), Ann Arbor.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Dermatology
Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(10):1086.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.