You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 89 No. 6, June 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Perioral Dermatitis

RICHARD MIHAN, MD; SAMUEL AYRES, JR., MD

Arch Dermatol. 1964;89(6):803-805.


Abstract

The entity we are designating "perioral dermatitis" is not common, but one to three cases are seen in our private practice every year. Women, mostly in the younger age group, are most often affected. It is polymorphous so far as individual lesions are concerned, being composed of discrete papules, papulovesicles, and vesicopustules, or more diffuse erythema and scaling. However, its distribution about the mouth is remarkably constant. Mild to moderate itching and burning are present. We feel we are discussing the same dermatitis delineated by Frumess and Lewis under the name "light-sensitive seborrheid." On the basis of a rather high incidence (43%) of seborrhea capitis among our small series of patients, we could entertain the possibility of this eruption being a "seborrheid," but in none of our patients were we able to obtain any history of sensitivity to sunlight or to any other rays in the ultraviolet spectrum. We do not feel perioral dermatitis is related to the erythrose peribuccale pigmentaire of Brocq 2 either, since the latter condition is essentially macular in character, and shows more or less permanent pigmentary changes that are lacking in the former. Nor were the changes of rosacea in the characteristic sites found in our patients.

Unfortunately, we were unable to tie in the outbreaks in our patients with any other possible etiologic agents. The condition is resistant to therapy more often than not, and medication remains symptomatic and empirical.



Author Affiliations

LOS ANGELES



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Periorbital Dermatitis
Arch Dermatol 1976;112:563-563.
ABSTRACT  

Perioral Dermatitis and Candida albicans
Bradford and Montes
Arch Dermatol 1972;105:892-895.
ABSTRACT  

Facial Dermatitis of Unknown Cause
Kaufman
JAMA 1965;192:252-253.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.