You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 91 No. 1, January 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Detection of Neomycin Sensitivity

A Comparison of Testing Techniques

ERNST EPSTEIN, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1965;91(1):50-53.


Abstract

Neomycin sensitivity can be detected in more than 90% of all cases with a 48-hour occlusive patch test of 20% aqueous neomycin sulfate. Delayed reactions are common, and five to seven day readings must be made if the test is negative at the initial observation.

An occasional case of neomycin sensitivity will have negative patch tests even to the 20% neomycin concentration. In such an instance, intradermal testing is indicated. With proper technique, intradermal testing for neomycin sensitivity is reliable.

Preliminary excoriation of a neomycin patch test site (scratch-patch test) results in frequent primary irritant reactions which at times are difficult to distinguish from an allergic reaction. The scratch-patch test is too erratic for clinical practice.

The clinical manifestations of neomycin allergy are frequently subtle and atypical. To avoid overlooking such cases of neomycin sensitivity, a high index of suspicion must be combined with proper patch testing.



Author Affiliations

SAN MATEO, CALIF

San Mateo Medical Clinic.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Contact Dermatitis to Neomycin Sulfate
Leyden and Kligman
JAMA 1979;242:1276-1278.
ABSTRACT  

Evans Blue Dermatitis
Guill and Odom
Arch Dermatol 1979;115:1071-1073.
ABSTRACT  

Epidemiology of Contact Dermatitis in North America: 1972
Arch Dermatol 1973;108:537-540.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Contact Dermatitis From the Perfume in Mycolog Cream
Goldberg
Arch Dermatol 1972;105:896-897.
ABSTRACT  

Neomycin Sensitivity in the: Normal (Nonatopic) Individual
Patrick et al.
Arch Dermatol 1970;102:532-535.
ABSTRACT  

Percutaneous Absorption Following Topical Application of Neomycin
Panzer and Epstein
Arch Dermatol 1970;102:536-539.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Nystatin
Wasilewski
Arch Dermatol 1970;102:216-217.
ABSTRACT  

Contact-Group Sensitization to Triphenylmethane Dyes: Gentian Violet, Brilliant Green, and Malachite Green
Bielicky and Novak
Arch Dermatol 1969;100:540-543.
ABSTRACT  

Ethylenediamine: Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Epstein and Maibach
Arch Dermatol 1968;98:476-477.
ABSTRACT  

The Value of Neomycin in a Neomycin-Steroid Cream
Davis et al.
JAMA 1968;203:298-300.
ABSTRACT  

Allergy to Dermatologic Agents
Epstein
JAMA 1966;198:517-520.
ABSTRACT  

Paraben Sensitivity
SCHORR and MOHAJERIN
Arch Dermatol 1966;93:721-723.
ABSTRACT  

Neomycin Contact Dermatitis Superimposed on Otitis Externa
Jensen et al.
JAMA 1966;195:131-133.
ABSTRACT  

Lids, Lacrimal Apparatus, and Conjunctiva
BURNS
Arch Ophthalmol 1965;74:850-867.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.