You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 92 No. 2, August 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LABORATORY STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Recent Advances in the Understanding of the Penicillin Urticarias

OTIS F. JILLSON, MD; PAUL S. PORTER, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1965;92(2):200-204.


Abstract

The three major groups of immunoglobulins ({gamma}G, {gamma}A, and {gamma}M) associated with this disease are reviewed. The presence or absence of atopic disease may account for percentage variability of {gamma}A because reagins (skin-sensitizing antibodies) are found in this immunoglobulin. The {gamma}A is the antibody usually responsible for anaphylaxis, rather than the {gamma}G precipitins, so stressed in the past. All three immunoglobulins may be found in serum sickness, which could account for the complex nature of this type of penicillin urticaria.

The merits of the immunological tests (penicilloyl-polylysine, benzyl penicillin, hemagglutination, basophil degranulation) for the detection of penicillin sensitivity are analyzed, partcularly as each applies to the various types of penicillin urticaria (serum sickness, anaphylactic, dermographic, delayed dermographic, and simple chronic urticaria and the lupus diathesis). The penicilloyl-polylysine test is greatly overrated as a means of predicting possible anaphylaxis. The benzyl penicillin skin test properly performed is an excellent means of indicating this.



Author Affiliations

HANOVER, NH

From the Department of Dermatology, Dartmouth Medical School, and the Department of Dermatology, Hitchcock Clinic, Hanover, NH. Associate Professor of Dermatology, Dartmouth Medical School (Dr. Jillson); Resident in Dermatology, Hitchcock Clinic (Dr. Porter).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 4, 1965.

Presented at the American Academy of Dermatology meeting, Chicago, Dec 1964.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, Hitchcock Clinic, Hanover, NH (Dr. Jillson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.