 |
 |

Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (Antea Lipoid Proteinosis) in SistersA Therapeutic Trial With Adenosine Monophosphate
DEREK J. CRIPPS, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1966;94(6):682-686.
Abstract
Two sisters with erythropoietic protoporphyria were given adenosine monophosphate (AMP; adenosine-5-monophosphate; My-B-Den) as a therapeutic trial for five months. This medication failed to produce a significant decrease in the high level of erythrocyte, plasma, or stool protoporphyrins or prevent the recurrence of photosensitivity. In both patients, a considerable natural variation of these porphyrin determinations was observed. The variation in the quantity of plasma and erythrocyte protoporphyrin appeared to be directly related but independent of the fecal protoporphyrin. These cases were previously reported as examples of lipoid proteinosis, principally because of the histological presence of hyalinosis cutis; although this was limited to the light-exposed areas of skin. There have been 150 cases of lipoid proteinosis (hyalinosis cutis et mucosae) described, of which six have now been identified as erythropoietic protoporphyria.
Author Affiliations
MADISON, WIS
From the Institute of Dermatology, St. John's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin, London, and the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin Medical Center, Madison.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication July 26, 1966.
Reprint requests to 1300 University Ave, Madison, Wis 53706 (Dr. Cripps).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Erythropoietic Protoporphyria With Hepatic Cirrhosis
Wells et al.
Arch Dermatol 1980;116:429-432.
ABSTRACT
Erythropoietic Protoporphyria: Report of a Case Successfully Treated With Carotene
Chapel et al.
Arch Dermatol 1972;105:572-573.
ABSTRACT
Erythropoietic Protoporphyria: A Clinical and Genetic Study
Reed et al.
JAMA 1970;214:1060-1066.
ABSTRACT
Fluorescing Erythrocytes and Porphyrin Screening Tests on Urine, Stool, and Blood: Investigation of Photosensitivity
Cripps and Peters
Arch Dermatol 1967;96:712-720.
ABSTRACT
|