You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 95 No. 3, March 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL STUDIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (52)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Photoallergies to Fenticlor and Multifungin

John N. Burry, MB, MRCP

Arch Dermatol. 1967;95(3):287-291.


Abstract

Photoallergy to fenticlor (S7) in three patients and to Multifungin in four patients is reported. Fenticlor (bis[2-hydroxy-5-chlorphenyl] sulfide), is related chemically to bithionol. Multifungin (5-bromo-4'-chlorosalicylanilide), is related chemically to tribromosalicylanilide. Fenticlor and Multifungin are used as antifungal applications in Australia.

Photo-patch tests were carried out using direct sunlight. Cross-sensitization between fenticlor and hexachlorophene was demonstrated and there was also evidence to suggest crosssensitization between fenticlor and bithionol. Cross-sensitization between Multifungin and tribromosalicylanilide was found in all four cases. There was a close similarity between the patchtest responses to these two chemicals.

Both localized and generalized photoallergies were noted in the same patient. The localized sensitivity might last for several months. The generalized sensitivity was transient. The possible mechanisms producing these responses are discussed in relation to the clinical findings, with emphasis placed upon the role that the abundant Australian sunshine must play.



Author Affiliations

Adelaide, South Australia

From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 8, 1966.

Reprint requests to 19 N Terrace, St. Peters, South Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chronic Actinic Dermatitis: Study of the Spectrum of Chronic Photosensitivity in 12 Patients
Lim et al.
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:317-323.
ABSTRACT  

The Clinical Spectrum of the Persistent Light Reactor
Kaidbey and Messenger
Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1441-1448.
ABSTRACT  

Persistent Photosensitivity Following Occupational Exposure to Epoxy Resin
Allen and Kaidbey
Arch Dermatol 1979;115:1307-1310.
ABSTRACT  

Photoallergy: A Review
Epstein
Arch Dermatol 1972;106:741-748.
ABSTRACT  

Persistent Light Reactions From Buclosamide
Burry
Arch Dermatol 1970;101:95-97.
ABSTRACT  

Cross Sensitivity Between Fenticlor and Bithionol
Burry
Arch Dermatol 1968;97:497-502.
ABSTRACT  

Contact Photosensitivity Patterns to Halogenated Salicylanilides: In Man and Guinea Pigs
Harber et al.
Arch Dermatol 1967;96:646-656.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.