 |
 |

Chlorpromazine PhotosensitivityPhototoxic and Photoallergic Reactions
Stephan Epstein, MD
Arch Dermatol. 1968;98(4):354-363.
Abstract
The clinical distinction between phototoxic and photoallergic contact dermatitis is difficult. Even a biopsy specimen from such a dermatitis rarely provides conclusive evidence. However, the histologic examination of biopsy specimens from photopatch tests in these cases is diagnostic, providing the tests are biopsied at the appropriate time.
Author Affiliations
Madison, Wis
From the Contact and Photosensitivity Clinic, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wis.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 10, 1968.
Read in part before the 50th Anniversary Meeting of the Minnesota Dermatological Society, Minneapolis, Sept 9, 1965.
Reprint requests to 2705 Marshall Court, Madison, Wis 53705 (Dr. Epstein).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Photoallergic Contact Dermatitis to Musk Ambrette: Histopathologic Features of Photobiologic Reactions Observed in a Persistent Light Reactor
Giovinazzo et al.
Arch Dermatol 1981;117:344-348.
ABSTRACT
Photoimmunology
Morison et al.
Arch Dermatol 1979;115:350-355.
ABSTRACT
Clinical and Histological Study of Coal Tar Phototoxicity in Humans
Kaidbey and Kligman
Arch Dermatol 1977;113:592-595.
ABSTRACT
Chlorpromazine Photosensitivity
Raffle et al.
Arch Dermatol 1975;111:1364-1365.
ABSTRACT
Photoallergy: A Review
Epstein
Arch Dermatol 1972;106:741-748.
ABSTRACT
|