You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 10, October 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal


Cosmetic Surgery for Aging Is Not Inherently Immoral

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In a recent issue of the ARCHIVES, Ringel1 raised the issue of "the morality of cosmetic surgery for aging."

She disparages cosmetic surgery because it does not "make people well" but simply "makes them happy."1 What is wrong with that?

Ringel says, "the advice of physicians is implicitly coercive."1 She says that when patients "are told they need an appendectomy, they are [receiving] an expert opinion that surgery is required. . . . "1 She then makes an analogy by stating that "when physicians tell patients that they need a blepharoplasty, they are [saying] that society is justified in judging them on the basis of their appearance."1 Does Ringel not credit her patients with enough sophistication to understand the difference between the two? Furthermore, what does she mean when she says physicians tell patients that they "need a blepharoplasty"?

Case 1. A 55-year-old woman presents to a physician for . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.