You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 12, December 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Issues in Dermatology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Procedures
 •Dermatologic Procedures, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Cosmetic Surgery/ Procedures
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Snake Oil for the 21st Century

Michael Bigby, MD
From the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1512-1514.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Dermatology has been associated with quackery for at least a century. The dictionary defines a quack as "a pretender to medical knowledge or skill; ignorantly or falsely pretending to cure."1 The term quack is derived from quacksalver, or one who quacks like a duck in promoting his salves.2 Quacksalvers hacked many potions, including snake oil, with claims that it cured everything from dermatitis to rheumatism. With the current promulgation of skin "products" and their promotion and even sale by dermatologists, and the use of treatments of no proven efficacy, this association between dermatology and quackery is set to continue well into the 21st century. The list of offending treatments includes silicone gel sheets and onion extract cream (Mederma) for keloids, {alpha}-hydroxy acid creams and peels, topical ascorbic acid and phytonadione, "laser resurfacing," and cimetidine for warts, to name only a few.

This seemingly unrelated collection of . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What Proportion of Dermatological Patients Receive Evidence-Based Treatment?
Abeni et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:771-776.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Welcome to Evidence-Based Medicine
Bigby
Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1516-1517.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.