You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 12, December 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Skin Cancer
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Neoplasms
 •Nevi
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Automated Epiluminescence Microscopy: Human vs Machine in the Diagnosis of Melanoma

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:1538-1540.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

OIL EPILUMINESCENCE microscopy (ELM), surface microscopy, dermatoscopy, and dermoscopy all refer to the same process of examination of cutaneous lesions with an incident light magnification system with oil at the skin-microscope interface. This technique greatly increases the morphological detail that is visualized, which results in an improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of most pigmented skin tumors, including melanoma.1-7 Well-defined ELM methods for the diagnosis of melanoma that are suitable for inexperienced clinicians have been developed,5, 8-9 and detailed atlases are also available.10-12 This allows formal training in ELM that, not surprisingly, is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy.7

To avoid the need for training, automated image analysis instruments are under development. Automated diagnostic instrumentation devices diagnose without the need for expertise by the operator. Development of such instruments has coincided with the worldwide increase in the incidence of melanoma, in awareness of the fact that the confidence level of nonexpert clinicians in . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Accuracy of Computer Diagnosis of Melanoma: A Quantitative Meta-analysis
Rosado et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:361-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improved Identification of Potentially Dangerous Pigmented Skin Lesions by Computerized Image Analysis
Jamora et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:195-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short-term Digital Surface Microscopic Monitoring of Atypical or Changing Melanocytic Lesions
Menzies et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1583-1589.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Diagnosis by Computerized Analysis of Clinical Images
Lambert et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:377-377.
FULL TEXT  

Epiluminescence Microscopy: A Reevaluation of Its Purpose
Bystryn
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:377-378.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.