You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 3, March 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Neoplasms
 •Diagnosis
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Thickness and Delay in Diagnosis of Melanoma

How Far Can We Go?

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:339-340.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

MANY GROUPS have for the past 20 years followed the lead of the Queensland Melanoma Programme, Australia, in promoting what is defined as secondary melanoma prevention.1 This is recognition of melanoma at the earliest possible time, on the assumption that early diagnosis and prompt treatment will reduce mortality.

Available evidence suggests that, in its earliest stages, when malignant melanomas are thinner than 1.5 mm, they may still be confined to the primary site and are therefore potentially curable. Thus, the aim is to minimize delay between recognizable tumor growth and excision on the assumption that there is a link between them, and that short delay is associated with thinner tumors.

This assumption was first made by the Queensland Melanoma Programme in their early detection of melanoma campaigns, which appear to have been extremely successful. At present, although the incidence of melanoma continues to rise in Queensland, melanoma mortality rates are . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Melanoma and Tumor Thickness: Challenges of Early Diagnosis
Marie Aleth Richard, Jean Jacques Grob, Marie Françoise Avril, Michèle Delaunay, Xavier Thirion, Pierre Wolkenstein, Pierre Souteyrand, Brigitte Dreno, Jean Jacques Bonerandi, Sophie Dalac, Laurent Machet, Jean Claude Guillaume, Jacqueline Chevrant-Breton, Catherine Vilmer, François Aubin, Bernard Guillot, Marie Beylot-Barry, Catherine Lok, Nadia Raison-Peyron, and Philippe Chemaly
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(3):269-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Early Detection of Thick Melanomas in the United States: Beware of the Nodular Subtype
Demierre et al.
Arch Dermatol 2005;141:745-750.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.