You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 5, May 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Hypersensitivity
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis

Where Do We Go From Here?

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:583-586.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

IN THIS issue of the ARCHIVES, Firooz et al1 present some data on the validity of the U.K. Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis (AD),2-4 which are based on the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka,5 in a sample of 416 patients of all ages attending a private dermatology clinic in Iran. Firooz et al1 found a sensitivity and specificity of 10% and 98%, respectively, compared with the clinical diagnosis of one senior private dermatologist. The authors state that although the high specificity of the criteria makes them suitable for clinical trial work, the poor validity of the criteria in this study makes them unsuitable for epidemiological use. For example, if the validity indices of this study are true, then in a population setting in which the true prevalence of AD is 10%, the positive predictive value of the criteria (proportion of those with a positive test result who really . . . [Full Text of this Article]

ATTRIBUTES OF A GOOD VALIDATION STUDY FOR DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA


USE THE CRITERIA QUESTIONS AND EXAMINATION PROTOCOL EXACTLY AS RECOMMENDED

ENSURE THAT TRANSLATION FOLLOWS A STRICT FORMAT

TEST THE CRITERIA IN THE SETTING IN WHICH THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE USED

ENSURE THAT THOSE ACTING AS ASSESSORS OR AS THE CLINICAL CRITERION STANDARD ARE BLINDED TO THE CRITERIA BEING TESTED

ENSURE THAT THE CLINICIAN WHO IS THE CLINICAL CRITERION STANDARD IS COMPARABLE TO OTHER CLINICIANS

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Validation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis
Alireza Firooz, Seyyed Massoud Davoudi, Alireza Naser Farahmand, Reza Majdzadeh, Mansour Nasiri Kashani, and Yahya Dowlati
Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(5):514-516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis: Consider the Context
Hanifin
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1551-1551.
FULL TEXT  

IgE Level and the Validation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis
Fisher et al.
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1550-1551.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.