This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dermatology, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:23.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Symbolic for me of all that is rickety about the construct on which dermatology is founded is the oft-quoted line of Hebra, uttered nearly one and a half centuries ago, to the effect that "Eczema is that which looks like eczema." Those words are usually spoken in hushed, reverent tones of approbation by dermatologists, instead of with a smile that conveys amusement at a sentence that is tautologic and therefore uninstructive. Perhaps that is why the word "eczema," the cornerstone of dermatology, has yet to be defined in an understandable, repeatable way. In fact, hardly any word in the edifice of dermatology has been defined in lucid fashion. If that is a fact, and I believe that it is, then what should be a rigorous discipline undergoing continual refinement is doomed to remain a muddle because not enough discipline has been brought to making the language of it comprehensible. In . . . [Full Text of this Article]

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Rigid Definitions Restrict the Evolution of Understanding
Gniadecki and Ackerman
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1271-1271.
FULL TEXT