You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 12, December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Evidence-Based Dermatology: Research Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Neoplasms
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is the Self-counting of Moles a Valid Method of Assessing Melanoma Risk?

Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1550-1551.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Agreement between self-assessment of melanocytic nevi by patients and dermatologic examination
Buettner PG, Garbe C
Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:72-77

The objective was to determine whether people can identify themselves as being at risk for melanoma through the self-counting of moles. In this case-control study, the patient population consisted of 513 patients with melanoma diagnosed in 1991 who were recruited from 9 cooperating university dermatology departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The controls were 498 patients without melanoma from the participating dermatology clinics. Subjects were provided with information about the self-assessment of benign melanocytic nevi using German colloquial terms for the description of common and atypical nevi. Examinations by dermatologists took place after the self-assessments and were used as the criterion standard. Patients and dermatologists were specifically asked to categorize the total number of melanocytic nevi on the whole body (0, 1-9, 10-19, 20-39, 40-59, 60-100, or >100). They . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Editor's Comment



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Risk of Developing a Subsequent Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Patients With a History of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: A Critical Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis
Isabelle Marcil and Robert S. Stern
Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(12):1524-1530.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Multiple Interpretations of Cancer Risks From Body Mole Counts in Preventive Care
Fusaro
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:823-823.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.