 |
 |

"Significant" Scientific Productivity Should Be Weighed Against the Expenses Necessary to Finance It
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
I read with great interest the article by Stern and Arndt1 about top cited authors in dermatology. In my opinion, however, the impact of a given single medical article should be expressly distinguished from the global productivity of the author and/or group and/or institution and measured by its true influence on the science and practice of dermatology. It is evident that, if an author publishes, say, 1 million articles a year, some among these will be necessarily cited as a result of a "mass effect." It is reasonable to believe that such a mass effect is heavily influenced by financial and editorial power, as well as by personal acquaintances and introductions, unless we uncritically affirm that "important authors publish a great deal because they are the best authors, and they are the best because they publish so much." As a result, such authors will be granted more funds, will publish . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|