You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 9, September 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The Underestimated Importance of Dermatologic Surgery

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 128 words of the full text and any section headings.

Please let me know exactly why Dermatologic Surgery, an Index Medicus, peer-reviewed journal with substantial clinical impact, is not listed to be regularly reviewed for your guidelines. The inexcusable delay of the American Academy of Dermatology in producing evidence-based liposuction guidelines has made California's legislation gains more difficult. The bulk of the articles on this and other surgical topics in our present guidelines are in Dermatologic Surgery. I fear that the omission of this important journal from the list may be a sad testimony to the underestimated importance of dermatologic surgery by the section editors; it suggests imbalance and bias toward medical dermatology in the roster of section editors. Please clarify. Thank you.

Harold J. Brody, MD
478 Peachtree St, NE
711-A Doctors Bldg
Atlanta, GA 30308

Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1174.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.