You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 1, January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comparison of Montelukast and Fexofenadine for Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a troublesome disorder with an unknown etiological agent. Mast cell activation and release of mediators occur in all forms of urticaria. Although histamine is the principal inflammatory mediator of mast cell derivation, other mediators are freed after mast cell activation such as cysteinyl leukotrienes (leukotrienes C4, D4, and E4).1 We evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an antileukotriene drug, montelukast sodium,2 in relation to fexofenadine hydrochloride, an antihistaminic drug, in patients affected by CIU.

Study

Twenty-seven patients affected with CIU were selected; the 4 men and 23 women were aged between 20 and 74 years. The study was conducted for 30 days in double-blind fashion, dividing the patients into 2 groups: 15 took montelukast (10 mg/d), while the 12 patients in the control group took fexofenadine (180 mg/d). All patients underwent a skin test with autologous serum2 and routine blood chemistry tests before . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Conclusions


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Montelukast Treatment of Urticaria
McBayne and Siddall
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:939-942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.