 |
 |

Lisch Nodules and Skin Manifestation in Neurofibromatosis Type 1
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) develops various neurocutaneous manifestations in patients at various ages.1 It has been suggested that Lisch nodules or pigmented iris hamartomas appear in infancy or early childhood2; however, the frequency of their appearance has been reported to range from 56% to 97% in patients with NF1; there is great discrepancy among these reports.3-4 Since Lisch nodules are usually asymptomatic, little information is available on their clinical behavior.
In the present study, patients with NF1 were examined over an 11-year period for both ophthalmological and dermatological abnormalities. The characteristics of Lisch nodules as well as their correlation with NF1 skin manifestations of café au lait spots and cutaneous neurofibroma are reported herein.
Patients and Methods
Seventy patients with NF1(average age, 22 years; age range, 3 months to 79 years) were first dermatologically examined and then ophthalmologically examined using slitlamp biomicroscopy. For 20 patients (average age, 10.5 years), serial multiple ophthalmological . . . [Full Text of this Article] Results
Comment
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
A Quantitative Assessment of the Burden and Distribution of Lisch Nodules in Adults with Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Boley et al.
IOVS 2009;50:5035-5043.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Mosaicism in sporadic neurofibromatosis type 1: variations on a theme common to other hereditary cancer syndromes?
Kehrer-Sawatzki and Cooper
J. Med. Genet. 2008;45:622-631.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Review Article : Neurofibromatosis 1: Clinical Review and Exceptions to the Rules
Young et al.
J Child Neurol 2002;17:613-621.
ABSTRACT
Absence of Lisch Nodules in Sporadic Neurofibromatosis Type 1 May Reflect Somatic Mosaicism
Vabres et al.
Arch Dermatol 2002;138:839-840.
FULL TEXT
|