 |
 |

A Copy Editor Has No Right to Distort an Author's Meaning
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In my letter to the editor in the May 2001 issue of the ARCHIVES,1 the crux of my thesis was set forth in a single
sentence that, when written by me and sent off to the ARCHIVES, read as follows:
"But some colleagues disposed favorably to dermatologic surgery, I among them,
are concerned about a distressing trend in that field to cosmetology and to
the failure of leaders like Drs Brody and Coleman to decry it." A copy editor
for the ARCHIVES took the liberty of changing the sentence to read thus: "But
some colleagues disposed favorably to dermatologic surgery, I among them,
are concerned about a distressing trend in that field to the name cosmetology
and to the failure of leaders like Drs Brody and Coleman to decry it."
The issue that I wrote about is not the name, but rather the transformation
of a magnificent, multifaceted discipline, namely, . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|