 |
 |

Clinical and Serological Transition From Pemphigus Vulgaris to Pemphigus Foliaceus Demonstrated by Desmoglein ELISA System
Yukiko Tsuji, MD;
Toshimitsu Kawashima, MD, PhD;
Koichi Yokota, MD, PhD;
Yasuki Tateish, MD;
Yuki Tomita, MD;
Tetsuri Matsumura, MD, PhD;
Hiroshi Shimizu, MD, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:95-96.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
INTRODUCTION
Several cases in which the disease course has undergone a transition
from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) to pemphigus foliaceus (PF) or vice versa have
been reported in the literature. The disease transition in these cases was
determined by means of clinical and histopathological observations and immunoblot
analysis. To our knowledge, the case described herein represents the first
report to clearly demonstrate the serological transition from mucous PV to
mucocutaneous PV to PF using a desmoglein (Dsg) enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) system.
REPORT OF A CASE
A 55-year-old Japanese man presented to our outpatient clinic in March
1997 with a 3-month history of intractable oral erosions (Figure 1A). Clinical, histopathological, and immunological findings
led to the diagnosis of PV. Using a Dsg ELISA system (Dsg1/3 ELISA kit; Medical
& . . . [Full Text of this Article]
COMMENT
From the Department of Dermatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School
of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Frequency of Shifts Over Time in the Profile of Antidesmoglein Antibodies in Pemphigus Vulgaris
Weitz and Bystryn
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1073-1074.
FULL TEXT
Antibody Titers to Desmogleins 1 and 3 in a Patient With Paraneoplastic Pemphigus Associated With Follicular Dendritic Cell Sarcoma
Seishima et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1500-1503.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Use of ELISA to Detect Desmoglein Antibodies in a Pregnant Woman and Fetus
Okubo et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:1217-1218.
FULL TEXT
|