This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Renato Grilli, MD; Luisa Soriano, MD; Carmen Fariña, MD; Lucia Martin, MD; Luis Requena, MD
Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Madrid, Spain

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:527-532.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

REPORT OF A CASE

A 72-year-old white woman with a history of hypertension that had been treated in the past with nifedipine presented with an asymptomatic cutaneous eruption that was limited to the skin covered by her swimming suit. The eruption had first appeared 3 years earlier, and she attributed its origin to a new swimming suit that she had worn during the summer when the rash first appeared. The next 2 summers she had worn the same swimming suit, without noting any change in the cutaneous lesions. Her primary care physician attributed the eruption to nifedipine use and changed her medication to verapamil, but the cutaneous lesions remained unchanged. The patient did not use any underwear that covered the same areas as her swimming suit.

Physical examination revealed a cutaneous eruption that was limited to the areas of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?