 |
 |

An Inaccuracy in an Otherwise Solid Study
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
I agree with the conclusion drawn by Dr Kashani-Sabet and colleagues
in their article titled "Vascular Involvement in the Prognosis of Primary
Cutaneous Melanoma"1 and expressed by them
as follows:
The results of our analysis clearly indicate the independent
role of vascular involvement in the prognostic assessment of patients with
melanoma. The presence of vascular involvement was associated with an increased
risk of melanoma relapse and death. Interestingly, involvement of the tumor
vasculature, which is believed to represent largely lymphatic vessels, was
predictive of distant as well as regional nodal metastases. . . . Prior studies
of definite vascular invasion have suggested the high-risk nature of this
prognostic factor.
I do not agree, however, with their statements that
the role of this factor [vascular invasion] in the prognostic
assessment of malignant melanoma has remained controversial. For instance,
several studies from large databases of patients with melanoma show conflicting
results with . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
The Significance of Vascular Invasion in Primary Melanomas of Thin or Intermediate Thickness
Lambert
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:809-809.
FULL TEXT
|