You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 10, October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book and New Media Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Atlas of Clinical Dermatology, 3rd ed

by Anthony du Vivier, 748 pp, $220, ISBN 0 4430 7220 5, Edinburgh, Scotland, Churchill Livingstone, 2002.

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1376.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Pastrami, extra lean ("the finest"), is $26 per pound. But once you consume your -lb on rye, the only thing you have to show for it is an extra fold over your belt and a spicy aftertaste.

The magnificently illustrated, beautifully organized, and weighty (10 lb) third edition of du Vivier's Atlas of Clinical Dermatology is more than well worth the price of $22 per pound.

The book is divided into 32 chapters consisting of morphology and distribution of skin lesions, normal structure and function, common cutaneous disorders, tumors, infections, tropical infections, drug eruptions, blistering diseases, developmental disorders, vascular lesions, disorders of appendageal structures, psychological disorders, the neonatal period, pregnancy, disorders with regional variations, and skin side effects of corticosteroids.

The emphasis throughout this tome is on the photographic images, which are perfect. There is just the right mixture of distance and close-up images, and they are presented on the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Paul I. Schneiderman, MD, Reviewer
Syosset, NY



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.