You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 12, December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Off-Center Fold
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Diagnosis
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pruritic Erythematous Macules in a 72-Year-Old Woman—Quiz Case

Amy B. Norton, MD; Rodney F. Kovach, MD; Jeffrey B. Jackson, MD; Susan C. Touma, MD
West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1647-1652.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

REPORT OF A CASE

A 72-year-old white woman presented with an 18-month history of severely pruritic, erythematous, telangiectatic macules localized to the trunk, buttocks, and upper part of the thighs. She complained of night sweats, intermittent nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, but denied any flushing, heart palpitations, or syncope.

Her medical history was unremarkable except for a previously diagnosed dermatomyositislike eruption associated with proximal muscle weakness, which had resolved after a course of prednisone several years earlier. There was no family history of dermatologic disease. Physical examination revealed the presence of red-brown, telangiectatic, ill-defined macules measuring 4 to 7 mm in diameter and involving the trunk, buttocks, and upper part of the thighs. The lesions blanched with diascopy and did not urticate on stroking (Figure 1). No hepatosplenomegaly was noted.


 
Figure appears in full text version.
Figure 1.


A 4-mm punch biopsy specimen . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Pruritic Erythematous Macules in a 72-Year-Old Woman—Diagnosis
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(12):1647-1652.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.