You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 1, January 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Archives a Century Ago
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

MELANOMA.

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:12.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THE JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS DISEASES INCLUDING SYPHILIS
VOL. XXIII.
JANUARY, 1905.
NO. 1.

By JAMES C. JOHNSTON, A.B., M.D.

Unna’s Theory of Origin: Briefly his contention is as follows: Studying the nævi of infants and children—i.e., in an early stage—he describes a process of downgrowth and snaring off by connective tissue of the epithelium.

Ribbert’s Theory: Ribbert occupies a unique position which is capable of perfect defense, since it cannot be assailed. He holds that one cell only can, a priori, give rise to melanosarcoma, the chromatophore. "Since the pigment cells of the choroid are characteristic in shape and in the production of pigment and cannot be identified with any other connective tissue element, it is certain that tumor cells originating from them must represent special cells that cannot be mistaken for the elements of any other sarcoma even if . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Editor's Comment







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.