 |
 |

The Role of Dermoscopy and Digital Dermoscopy Analysis in the Diagnosis of Pigmented Skin Lesions
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1444-1446.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In the past few decades, the incidence rate of cutaneous melanoma has increased more rapidly than for any other cancer.1-2 This has been attributed partly to a real change in the incidence rate of the disease and partly to greater surveillance.3-4 Unfortunately, advanced melanoma is still practically incurable, and a favorable prognosis depends on specific prevention and early detection. Recognition in the initial stage is currently the best factor for complete recovery.5
Diagnostic accuracy has improved since noninvasive methods such as classic or digital epiluminescence dermoscopy and digital dermoscopy analysis (DDA) became available to dermatologists.6-10 These methods permit enlargement and evaluation of lesion images from the surface down to the depth of the dermoepidermal junction. Many studies7, 11 have shown a significantly improved accuracy in diagnosing melanoma when these instruments are used by expert clinicians. However, many dermatologists are still diffident about using instruments or machines to diagnose melanoma.
In this . . . [Full Text of this Article] DERMOSCOPY AND DIGITAL DERMOSCOPY
DIGITAL DERMOSCOPY ANALYSIS
CONCLUSIONS
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Pietro Rubegni, MD;
Marco Burroni, PhD;
Andrea Andreassi, MD;
Michele Fimiani, MD
RELATED ARTICLE
The Performance of SolarScan: An Automated Dermoscopy Image Analysis Instrument for the Diagnosis of Primary Melanoma
Scott W. Menzies, Leanne Bischof, Hugues Talbot, Alex Gutenev, Michelle Avramidis, Livian Wong, Sing Kai Lo, Geoffrey Mackellar, Victor Skladnev, William McCarthy, John Kelly, Brad Cranney, Peter Lye, Harold Rabinovitz, Margaret Oliviero, Andreas Blum, Alexandra Virol, Brian DeAmbrosis, Roderick McCleod, Hiroshi Koga, Caron Grin, Ralph Braun, and Robert Johr
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(11):1388-1396.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|