You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Neoplasms
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

VIGNETTE
Value of Preoperative Determination of Skin Tumor Thickness With 20-MHz Ultrasound

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Twenty-megahertz ultrasound is a potentially useful noninvasive method for the preoperative determination of tumor dimensions and for defining tumor margins and shape.1 Using 20-MHz ultrasound equipment (Dermascan C; Cortex Technology, Hadsund, Denmark), we examined 35 different types of skin tumors (basal cell carcinoma [n = 12], nevus pigmentosus [n = 9], dysplastic nevus [n = 3], dermatofibroma [n = 3], fibropapilloma [n = 2], seborrheic keratosis [n = 2], malignant melanoma [n = 1], lipofibroma [n = 1], neurofibroma [n = 1], and keratosis actinica [n = 1]) before surgery. The maximal vertical diameter of the tumors was determined by combined A- and B-mode. After ultrasound examination, the tumors were surgically removed and a definite diagnosis was made. Hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections were histopathologically examined to determine the maximal vertical diameter of the tumors using an ocular micrometer. The tumor dimensions were statistically correlated (linear correlation and t test).

Results

The sonometrically determined . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Comment

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Dragan L. Jovanovic, MD, PhD; Vuka Katic, MD, PhD; Braslav Jovanovic, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Ultrasonography Using Simple Diagnostic Criteria vs Palpation for the Detection of Regional Lymph Node Metastases of Melanoma
Philippe Saiag, Marion Bernard, Alain Beauchet, Marie-Lise Bafounta, Isabelle Bourgault-Villada, and Sophie Chagnon
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(2):183-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ultrasound Scanning in Dermatology
Monika-Hildegard Schmid-Wendtner and Walter Burgdorf
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(2):217-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Efficacy of Diagnostic Ultrasonography of Lipomas, Epidermal Cysts, and Ganglions
Kuwano et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:761-764.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.