You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 12, December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Evidence-Based Dermatology: Research Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Bug Buster for Head Lice

Is It Effective?

Olivier Chosidow, MD, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1635-1637.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Commentary on: Single blind randomised, comparative study of the Bug Buster kit and over-the-counter pediculicide treatments against head lice in the United Kingdom
Hill N, Moor G, Cameron MM, et al.
BMJ. 2005;331:384-387

Question: In patients with head lice, does intervention with the Bug Buster kit or pediculicide treatment lead to higher rates of cure?

Design: Randomized, outcome-evaluator–masked, active-controlled trial.

Setting: Academic-driven, community-recruited patients from 4 counties in England and 1 county in Scotland after information has been widely distributed to general practitioners (GPs), local pharmacies, primary schools, and parents' meetings.

Patients: Young people aged 2 to 15 years with head lice infestation.

Intervention: Each participating GP was assigned an individual randomization list at the start of the trial. Patients were randomized to (1) home use of the Bug Buster kit (4 sequential applications combed on wet, conditioned hair at 3-day intervals) or (2) a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Comment


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie-Paris 6 and Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France


RELATED LETTER

Clinical Evaluation of Bug Busting: Response to Suggestions of Bias
Nigel Hill
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(12):1651-1653.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Evaluation of Bug Busting: Response to Suggestions of Bias
Hill
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1651-1653.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.