 |
 |

Bug Buster for Head Lice
Is It Effective?
Olivier Chosidow, MD, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1635-1637.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Commentary on: Single blind randomised, comparative study of the Bug Buster kit and over-the-counter pediculicide treatments against head lice in the United Kingdom Hill N, Moor G, Cameron MM, et al. BMJ. 2005;331:384-387
Question: In patients with head lice, does intervention with the Bug Buster kit or pediculicide treatment lead to higher rates of cure?
Design: Randomized, outcome-evaluatormasked, active-controlled trial.
Setting: Academic-driven, community-recruited patients from 4 counties in England and 1 county in Scotland after information has been widely distributed to general practitioners (GPs), local pharmacies, primary schools, and parents' meetings.
Patients: Young people aged 2 to 15 years with head lice infestation.
Intervention: Each participating GP was assigned an individual randomization list at the start of the trial. Patients were randomized to (1) home use of the Bug Buster kit (4 sequential applications combed on wet, conditioned hair at 3-day intervals) or (2) a . . . [Full Text of this Article] Comment
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie-Paris 6 and Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Assistance PubliqueHôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
RELATED LETTER
Clinical Evaluation of Bug Busting: Response to Suggestions of Bias
Nigel Hill
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(12):1651-1653.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Clinical Evaluation of Bug Busting: Response to Suggestions of Bias
Hill
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1651-1653.
FULL TEXT
|